The 2 Groups' Interpretation

Today 2 performing groups perfoemed their 2 minutes of their own representation of the play with all the scenes (1-6).
The first group showed an interpretation as if their the real character, however they changed their representation when the scene changes according to the atmosphere. They changed the lights according to the way they move and the mood of the scene, have backgroud to make it more realistic.


The second group showed a modern representation of the play as they put some "slang" words in there. They did their performances much more differently than the first group.

Where was each set?
Each groups' were set differently from each other, because the first group is kind of from the book and they represent their attitudes on the characters that are similar of what kind of character they were, but the second group shows a more modern set with modern words (slang) that have different attitudes and accents whis showed that their set aren't from the 1930s.

How did lighting and projection help to communicate the intention of the group?The lighting and the images projected in the performances were good.
The first group that showed their performance had both lighting and projection and it really boost their performance, because with the different lighting showed that there are different people that need focus on and to set up the mood, the projection made the atmosphere feel much more into the scenes.
The second group didn't have lighting and projection, so it made it more less realistic and less feel of the mood.

How did the decisions made about vocals and characterisation help?Both groups' decisions about their vocals and characterisation hepled a lot, because it really showed what kind of characters they want to show to the audiences and these made it more interesting.

What about the use of space?The use of space throughout the stage were good as they move about the space and used it correctly with the help of the lightings.

How were the demands of act 3 met and why?
Were the intentions of your group met?

What moment or moments would best illustrate your interpretation and why?

What new thoughts and ideas do you have about the play as a result of this lesson?I think that there can be many different interpretations of the different characters in the play, vocals and good characterisations boost up the attitude of the character and make it more realistic.

If you were directing this play what ideas would you definitely keep?